All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Key challenges consist of determining and handling these dangers effectively, stabilizing employee needs with compliance, and adjusting MTC rules for safe and cost-effective movement. If handled well, remote work can be a strategic advantage for multinationals, using operational continuity and access to skill. Relying on outdated policies might create liabilities, such as unexpected tax exposure and compliance concerns.
Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Consultant, EMIR Mirages often deceive the eye in the desert, appealing water and relief where there is none. Likewise, the Middle East, at the moment, can appear intimidating to international magnate who incorrectly take a look at it as one uniform bloc. But unlike mirages, and in spite of geopolitical stress in the wider region, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' capacity is no illusion.
Numerous regional leaders of international business still have a hard time to unshackle themselves from misunderstandings and predispositions held by an international HQ that often looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. International budget holders' typically misguided perspectives can lead to missed out on chances and impede development. With over a years of experience recommending local business leaders in the Middle East, I have actually seen how crucial it is to make the case for the area by focusing on these five easy actions.
This place also runs extremely in a different way from our domestic market, so don't anticipate the exact same direct pathways to development and timelines." This method requires robust preparation, clear communication, a deep local network and an abundant understanding of the local company environment due to the fact that, ultimately, you have to provide on that guaranteed development.
By dispelling mistaken beliefs and engaging proactively, local CEOs can open the region's real potential, changing perceived mirages into a sanctuary of opportunities waiting to be found.
Arrange a session with our experts to check out how YCP can help you in resolving your business difficulties.
Likewise, regarding Israel's controversial policies of limiting humanitarian aid into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's complete blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May triggered a remarkable deterioration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed option to the UN aid distribution system in Gaza, began operations at 4 distribution websites.
Taken together, these policies show two linked aspects of the Trump administration's technique to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's choices and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has not pressed back on the Israeli government's plans to occupy Gaza City and by force evacuate Palestinians into a smaller sized area of Gaza.
They can best be captured by unloading how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave reacted. Not remarkably, their reactions vary considerably in all three cases. Their reactions also reflect the growing disparity in between these two local powers as they pursue widely differing techniques for how to shape the Middle East's emerging order.
It has actually signified a determination to use force whenever and anywhere risks occur. This determination has actually equated into ever-bolder military interventions throughout the area that have redrawn the Middle East's balance of power. Yet, Israel has actually not translated these military gains into sustaining tactical wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's existing center of gravitythe necessary for economic diversity has sustained a drive to de-escalate tensions in the region, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and aspirations to develop out business and trade ties across the Middle East and beyond.
Just like Israel, nevertheless, whether and how Saudi Arabia equates its broadening leverage into enduring tactical gains remains to be seen. Israel was highly encouraging of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. For years and across multiple U.S. administrations, Prime Minister Netanyahu looked for U.S. support for and participation in strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Israel has made clear that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either circumstance. Missing a clear U.S. "red light" opposing additional Israeli military intervention in Iran, possibly paired with a U.S.Increasingly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the primary threat to regional stability.
Latest Posts
How to Utilize Market Intelligence for Growth
How to Deploy Advanced Strategies in 2026
Can the GCC Sustain Industrial Growth during 2026?
